MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089467148 · doi:10.1021/ja076658v

Dipolar Chemical Shift Correlation Spectroscopy for Homonuclear Carbon Distance Measurements in Proteins in the Solid State:  Application to Structure Determination and Refinement

2007· article· en· W2089467148 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohu Peng, David S. Libich, Rafal Janik, George Harauz, Vladimir Ladizhansky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomonuclear moleculeChemistryChemical shiftSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceSpectroscopyIntramolecular forceNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyTwo-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical physicsMoleculeNuclear magnetic resonancePhysical chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy has become a promising tool for protein structure determination. Here, we describe a new dipolar-chemical shift correlation experiment for the measurement of homonuclear 13C-13C distances in uniformly 13C,15N-labeled proteins and demonstrate its suitability for protein structure determination and refinement. The experiments were carried out on the beta1 immunoglobulin binding domain of protein G (GB1). Both intraresidue and interresidue distances between carbonyl atoms and atoms in the aliphatic side chains were collected using a three-dimensional chemical shift correlation spectroscopy experiment that uses homogeneously broadened rotational resonance recoupling for carbon mixing. A steady-state approximation for the polarization transfer function was employed in data analysis, and a total of 100 intramolecular distances were determined, all in the range 2.5-5.5 A. An additional 41 dipolar contacts were detected, but the corresponding distances could not be accurately quantified. Additional distance and torsional restraints were derived from the proton-driven spin diffusion measurements and from the chemical shift analysis, respectively. Using all these restraints, it was possible to refine the structure of GB1 to a root-mean square deviation of 0.8 A. The approach is of general applicability for peptides and small proteins and can be easily incorporated into a structure determination and refinement protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207