First Report of Elm Yellows Phytoplasma Infecting Clover in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the summer of 2008, phyllody and enlarged petioles resembling symptoms of phytoplasma infection were observed on clover (Trifolium repens) plants in lawns on the campus of Northwest A&F University. Typical phytoplasma-like bacteria were observed in the phloem cells when ultra-thin sections from leaf midrib tissues were examined with transmission electron microscopy. Nested PCR assays were used to verify the association of phytoplasma with the disease. Total DNA was extracted from the phloem of leaf midribs from 20 symptomatic plants and six symptomless plants using the modified CTAB method (1). Using the phytoplasma universal primer pair R16mF2/R16mR1 followed by specific primers R16F2n/R16R2 (4), PCR products of 1.4 and 1.2 kb were amplified, respectively, from symptomatic plants only. Jujube witches'-broom (JWB) and paulownia witches'-broom (PaWB) phytoplasma DNA samples served as controls and were used to study group relationships. After sequencing of the 16S rDNA fragment (GenBank Accession No. FJ436792), a BLAST search determined that the clover phytoplasma shared closest homology (99.6%) with JWB (GenBank Accession No. FJ154846) phytoplasmas compared with lesser identity (90.4%) with PaWB (GenBank Accession No. EF199937). Subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the PCR-amplified 1.2-kb 16S rDNA R 16 (1)F 1 /R 1 fragment indicated that the phytoplasma associated with the disease belongs to subgroup 16SrV-B of the elm yellows phytoplasma group. Clover phyllody phytoplasma were previously reported to infect clover in Canada (GenBank Accession No. L33762) (3) and Italy (GenBank Accession No. X77482) (2). The phytoplasma reported here shared 86.7 and 90.0% identity with the clover phyllody phytoplasma above, respectively, much lower than that with Elm yellows phytoplasma group. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Elm yellows phytoplasma infecting clover in China. References:(1) E. Angelini et al. Vitis 40:79, 2001. (2) G. Firrao et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 102:817, 1996. (3) N. A. Harrison et al. Plant Pathol. 52:147, 2003. (4) I.-M. Lee et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1153, 1998.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".