Hydrogen Sulfide Assessment in ShallowâPit Swine Housing and Outside Manure Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Saskatchewan, some recent incidents have lead us to believe that certain manure management activities can potentially release high concentrations of H2S into the atmosphere of shallow-pit barns. The objectives of the monitoring project reported here were to evaluate worker exposure to H2S during the completion of the following tasks: emptying of in-barn shallow manure pits, power washing of barn rooms, and agitation and emptying of outdoor manure storage facilities. In-barn monitoring was performed in gestation, farrowing, nursery, and grow-finish sections in the summer of 2001 and the winter of 2002 on four different farms. Plug pulling can generate very high concentrations of H2S. The maximum values recorded during some of the monitored events reached 1,000 ppm. The H2S released as a plug is being pulled does not follow a predictable pattern when considering the level that will be reached, the concentration variations during the event, and the time at which the peak concentration will be observed. Power washing generated lower H2S concentrations than plug pulling. However, as the task to be performed generally takes time, the 15 min time-weighed average of 15 ppm (STEL) can be reached after the task started and can be exceeded for a long period of time, which for some of the monitored events was more than 30 min. Finally, monitoring at the storage facilities showed that the risks of exposure to excessive H2S concentrations during the agitation and emptying of outside manure storage facilities were very limited. Results from this study suggest that pig production buildings involving short-term storage of liquid manure may present H2S exposure risks that have been underestimated until now. All workers should be provided with an H2S monitor and safety equipment to ensure that workers are protected when the H2S concentration rises. As well, engineering controls have to be developed to prevent H2S formation in the manure or H2S emission into the worker/pig space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".