Fitness, fatigue, disease activity, and quality of life in pediatric lupus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure aerobic fitness (maximum oxygen consumption [VO(2peak)]), fatigue, quality of life (QOL), and disease activity in young persons with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to determine an equation for predicting VO(2peak) from the distance walked in 6 minutes (6MW). METHODS: Fifteen young patients ages 12-19 years with SLE participated. VO(2) was measured by a graded treadmill exercise test. Submaximal exercise intensity was determined from the ventilatory anaerobic threshold. Submaximal aerobic capacity was measured using the 6MW. Patient questionnaires included measures of fatigue, QOL, and physical activity. Physician questionnaires included the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. RESULTS: Compared with age-matched norms, our patients had moderate impairment in aerobic fitness, with a mean +/- SD VO(2peak) of 31.1 +/- 7.9 ml/minute/kg and a mean 6MW distance Z score of -2.4 +/- 2.3. The regression equation to predict VO(2peak) (ml/minute/kg) from 6MW was as follows: 57.1 + [0.038 x distance (meters)] + (-0.35 x maximal heart rate) (R = 0.67, P = 0.027). Ten subjects (67%) reported significant fatigue. There was no significant correlation of fatigue with fitness measures. Neither fatigue nor fitness was significantly correlated with disease activity, disease damage, or QOL measures. CONCLUSION: Young SLE patients have lower aerobic fitness than reference norms. The 6MW may be used as a marker of fitness, but it is preferable to determine VO(2) with a graded exercise test. Fatigue is a significant symptom in young SLE patients. The application of fatigue measures in young persons is exploratory. The relationship between fatigue and aerobic fitness is not clear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".