MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089575266 · doi:10.1021/pr034114w

Capillary Isoelectric Focusing with Laser-Induced Fluorescence Whole Column Imaging Detection as a Tool To Monitor Reactions of Proteins

2004· article· en· W2089575266 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Liu, Janusz Pawliszyn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelectric focusingDenaturation (fissile materials)ChemistryIsoelectric pointChromatographyFluorescenceUreaBiomoleculeLaser-induced fluorescenceChemical kineticsKineticsChemical reactionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BiochemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) whole column imaging detection (WCID) has the characteristics of high resolution, high speed and high sensitivity for separation of amphoteric biomolecules. These features enable a CIEF-LIF-WCID system to monitor the dynamic process of a protein reaction. The reaction can be a physical change or a chemical reaction, provided that the kinetics of the reaction is slower than the focusing speed or that the intermediates involved have long enough life-span compared to the analysis time. The processes of denaturation (a physical reaction), reduction and carbamylation (both chemical reactions) were dynamically monitored. The CIEF profiles at successive reaction times clearly displayed the formation of different products at different stages. At incomplete denaturation, intermediates with higher apparent pI values relative to the products at complete denaturation were detected. Carbamylation products of a protein were detected when the protein reacted with a urea solution that had prepared three months earlier, exhibiting gradually decreased pI values. Mechanisms involved in these reactions were rationalized. A combined mechanism of denaturation and reduction was suggested to explain the denaturing process under high concentrations of urea. Potential applications and critical factors to manipulate these reactions were also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207