Interaction of α‐gliadin with poly(HEMA‐<i>co</i>‐SS): Structural characterization and biological implication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wheat gluten protein alpha-gliadin, a well known trigger of celiac disease, can be complexed by random copolymers of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and sodium 4-styrene sulfonate (SS). In this work, influence of alpha-gliadin and poly(HEMA-co-SS) concentrations on alpha-gliadin structure was studied using spectroscopic techniques and dynamic light scattering. In 70% ethanol or 0.06M HCl (pH 1.2), alpha-gliadin was found to self-associate upon increasing its concentrations and displayed decreased alpha-helical content and increased beta-turn and beta-sheet contents. At pH 1.2, alpha-gliadin interacted with poly(HEMA-co-SS) to form supra-molecular complex particles. Poly(HEMA-co-SS) induced alpha-gliadin structural changes that mimicked those obtained by varying the protein concentration in pure solution. At pH 6.8, alpha-gliadin was poorly soluble and formed large particles but alpha-helix is still main secondary structure. The influence of the polymer on protein structure was weaker at neutral than acidic pH. Interaction with poly(HEMA-co-SS) disrupted alpha-gliadin conformation and self-association to form new complex particles at neutral pH. This study provides insight into the mechanism of poly(HEMA-co-SS)/alpha-gliadin interaction and the polymer as alpha-gliadin sequestering agents in the supportive treatment of celiac disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".