Design of a<i>β</i>-detector for TITAN-EC and the first electron-capture branching ratio measurement in a Penning trap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At TRIUMF's ion trap for atomic and nuclear science (TITAN) a new experimental technique is being developed to measure electron-capture branching ratios of intermediate nuclei in double-β decays. The key feature of this novel technique is the use of an open access Penning trap. Radioactive ions are stored inside the trap while their decays are observed. X-rays following an electron capture are detected by x-ray detectors radially installed around the trap. Electrons originating from β-decays are guided out of the trap by the Penning trap's strong magnetic field where they are then detected by a Si-detector. Detailed simulations have been performed to determine the size and characterize the efficiency of this detector. During a beam time with radioactive 107In this β-detector has been used and for the first time an electron capture branching ratio has been determined with this novel technique of in-trap decay spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".