MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089662831 · doi:10.1021/bi060779a

Interaction of Cardiac Troponin C and Troponin I with W7 in the Presence of Three Functional Regions of Cardiac Troponin I

2006· article· en· W2089662831 on OpenAlexaff
Monica X. Li, Ryan M. B. Hoffman, Brian D. Sykes

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyTroponin CTroponinTroponin IInternal medicineTroponin complexMedicineChemistryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W7 is a well-known calmodulin (CaM) antagonist and has been implicated as an inhibitor of the troponin C-mediated Ca(2+) activation of cardiac muscle contraction. In this study, we use NMR spectroscopy to study binding of W7 to cardiac troponin C (cTnC) free or in complex with cardiac troponin I (cTnI) peptides. Titration of cTnC.3Ca(2+) with W7 shows that residues throughout the sequence, including the N- and C-domains of cTnC and the central linker, are affected. Analysis of the binding stoichiometry and the trajectories of chemical shift changes indicate that W7 binding occurs at multiple sites. To address the issue of whether multiple-site binding is relevant within the troponin complex, W7 is titrated to a cTnC-cTnI complex (cTnC.3Ca(2+).cTnI(34)(-)(71).cTnI(128)(-)(163)). In the presence of the N-terminal (residues approximately 34-71), inhibitory (residues approximately 128-147), and switch (residues approximately 147-163) regions of cTnI, W7 induces chemical shift changes only in the N-domain and not in the C-domain or the central linker of cTnC. The results indicate that in the presence of cTnI, W7 no longer binds to multiple sites of cTnC but instead binds specifically to the N-domain, and the binding (K(D) = 0.5 +/- 0.1 mM) can occur together with the switch region of cTnI. Hence, W7 may play a role in directly modulating the Ca(2+) sensitivity of the regulatory domain of cTnC and the interaction of the switch region of cTnI and cTnC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207