Incorporation of Fragment X into Fibrin Clots Renders Them More Susceptible to Lysis by Plasmin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bleeding, the most serious complication of thrombolytic therapy with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), is thought to result from lysis of fibrin in hemostatic plugs and from the systemic lytic state caused by unopposed plasmin. One mechanism by which systemic plasmin can impair hemostasis is by partially degrading fibrinogen to fragment X, a product that retains clottability but forms clots with reduced tensile strength that stimulate plasminogen activation by t-PA more than fibrin clots. The purpose of this study was to elucidate potential mechanisms by which fragment X accelerates t-PA-mediated fibrinolysis. In the presence of t-PA, clots containing fragment X were degraded faster than fibrin clots and exhibited higher rates of plasminogen activation. Although treatment with carboxypeptidase B, an enzyme that reduces plasminogen binding to fibrin, prolonged the lysis times of fragment X and fibrin clots, clots containing fragment X still were degraded more rapidly. Furthermore, plasmin or trypsin also degraded clots containing fragment X more rapidly than fibrin clots, suggesting that this effect is largely independent of plasminogen activation. Fragment X-derived degradation products were not preferentially released by plasmin from clots composed of equal concentrations of fibrinogen and fragment X, indicating that fragment X does not constitute a preferential site for proteolysis. These data suggest that structural changes resulting from incorporation of fragment X into clots promote their lysis. Thus, attenuation of thrombolytic therapy-induced fragment X formation may reduce the risk of bleeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".