MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089721843 · doi:10.14740/wjnu195w

Unilateral Complete Duplication of Ectopic, Refluxing Ureters: A Rarest Entity

2015· article· en· W2089721843 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vilas Sabale, Vikram Satav, Bhupender Kadyan, Sharad P. Kankalia, Deepak Mane, Abhirudra Mulay

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroureterEctopic ureterMedicineTrigone of urinary bladderHydronephrosisCystoscopyUreterUrethral diverticulumProstatic urethraSurgeryUrologyUrethraUrinary systemAnatomyInternal medicineProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ureter that opens at a site distal to the posterolateral aspect of the trigone is known as ectopic ureter. Commonly with complete duplication, upper moiety ureter can be ectopic. A 7-year-old boy presented with dull pain in right flank with repeated episodes of urinary tract infection. Clinically, no abnormality was detected. Ultrasonography revealed right gross hydronephrosis with hydroureter up to ureterovesical junction. Micturating cystourethrogram suggested grade V reflux in both ureters of complete duplication. Right kidney had 20% split function (glomerular filtration rate: 18 mL/minute). Cystoscopy revealed both the ureteric orifice in small prostatic urethral diverticulum. Common sheath ureteric reimplantation was done by Politano-Leadbetter technique. Ectopic ureteral orifice is not uncommon, especially with complete duplication. But complete duplication opening in ectopic position (prostatic urethra) with high grade reflux in both the ureters is extremely uncommon entity. No similar case report could be seen in available literature, making this a unique case. World J Nephrol Urol. 2015;4(1):181-182 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu195w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207