Role of Transtympanic Myringoplasty in Modern Otology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this era of bottom-line medicine, transtympanic myringoplasty, although in accordance with the principles of minimally invasive (or access) surgery, is still not popular among otologists. This study evaluates the success rate of transtympanic myringoplasty and defines its role in the current era. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, a tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS: The technique was carried out in 25 adult patients with chronic suppurative otitis media-mucosal disease under local anesthesia on the basis of day surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An intact graft at the end of the third month was considered a success. A 10 dB hearing improvement in two consecutive frequencies in the range of 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz was regarded as an audiologic success. Furthermore, the patient's perforations were divided into anterior, inferior, and posterior and the success rate was evaluated in each subgroup. Perforations were also classified into small and medium on the basis of surface area and evaluated statistically on the basis of the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: An overall success rate of 84% and 71.5% was recorded in terms of perforation closure and hearing improvement. Statistically, the surface area of the perforation did not influence the outcome of the result, but anteriorly placed perforations showed a poor graft uptake. CONCLUSIONS: From the results herein, we find the technique to be convenient, highly cost-effective, time saving, and patient friendly, with closure rates comparable to other standard techniques of myringoplasty
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".