MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089783795 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2009.2033611

Modulation Crosstalk and Reduction in Distributed Feedback Laser Diode and Monitor Photodiode Monolithically Integrated Optical Transceivers

2010· article· en· W2089783795 on OpenAlexaff
Qingyang Xu, Xun Li, Chang‐Qing Xu, Wei‐Ping Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodiodeOptoelectronicsOptical modulation amplitudeSemiconductor laser theoryLaser diodeCrosstalkDiodeLaserMaterials scienceOpticsDistributed feedback laserModulation (music)PhysicsWavelengthOptical amplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, modulation crosstalk from 1310 nm upstream optical signals to 1490 nm downstream optical signals in an distributed feedback laser diode and monitor photodiode (DFB-LD and MPD) monolithically integrated optical transceiver has been studied numerically through the time-domain traveling wave (TDTW) model. Interaction between the 1310/1490 nm wavelengths throughout the cavity originated from both cross gain modulation and cross phase modulation are the physical source of the crosstalk in the device, which were analyzed numerically in detail in the paper. A new structure is proposed to reduce the modulation crosstalk resulted from the interaction. Simulation shows that the modulation crosstalk can be drastically reduced by applying an adjustable current on the phase tuning section inserted between the DFB-LD and MPD, which verifies our design. Polarization and temperature dependence on the modulation crosstalk are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Quantum ElectronicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207