MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CORTICAL THINNING IN IBS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HOMEOSTATIC, ATTENTION, AND PAIN PROCESSING

2007· article· en· W2089820651 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karen D. Davis, George R. Pope, Judy Chuyi Chen, Chun L. Kwan, Adrian P. Crawley, Nicholas E. Diamant

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulaFibromyalgiaIrritable bowel syndromeAnterior cingulate cortexMedicineChronic painInsular cortexPsychiatryPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic pain may be accompanied by abnormal functioning in pain, attention, or homeostatic systems. We recently identified abnormal rectal-evoked functional MRI responses in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in brain regions associated with such systems, including the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).1 However, it is not known whether structural brain abnormalities contribute to these responses. We tested the hypothesis that abnormal cortical responses in IBS are at least partly due to structural differences within the insula and ACC. ### Methods. Right-handed healthy control subjects (n = 11, 7 women, 4 men; 24 to 50 years old) and patients with IBS (n = 9, 6 women, 3 men; 30 to 58 years old) provided written consent to procedures approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board. Control subjects were excluded if they had a history of bowel disorders, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, diabetes, or psychiatric illness. Patients were recruited from the Toronto Western Hospital Gastrointestinal Unit, met Rome III criteria2 for diagnosis of IBS, and had mild to moderate symptoms and pain for more than 2 years. Exclusion criteria were a history of …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207