Prodigiosin synthesis with electron rich 2,2′-bipyrroles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prodigiosins possess a linear tripyrrolic scaffold with the A and B pyrrolic rings connected directly in a bipyrrole unit, and the B and C rings joined in a dipyrrin. These red streptomycete metabolites exhibit among other activities, antitumor, antimicrobial, and immunomodulating properties. A new prodigiosin synthesis has been developed that employs electron rich 2,2′-bipyrroles. In particular, undecylprodigiosin and PNU-156804 were synthesized by condensations of 4-methoxy and 4-benzyloxy 2,2′-bipyrroles, 20a and 20b, respectively, with 5-undecylpyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde in 75% and 83% yields. The 4-alkoxy-2,2′-bipyrroles were synthesized from 4-alkoxypyrrolyl butenyl ketones (15a and 15b), which were made by a novel one-pot process from 2-acyl-N-(PhF)pyrrolidin-4-one (13) [PhF = 9-(9-phenylfluorenyl)] using PhFNa in the presence of alkyl halide. A sequence of alkoxy pyrrole 15a and 15b protection, olefin oxidation, Paal–Knorr condensation, and deprotection gave the requisite 4-alkoxy-2,2′-bipyrroles (20). This route offers utility for making 4-alkoxybipyrroles as well as prodigiosins with diversity at the 6-position of the linear tripyrrolic skeleton.Key words: prodigiosin, pyrrole, bipyrrole, PNU-156804, undecylprodigiosin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".