Anisotropic frequency-dependent spreading of seismic waves from first-arrival vertical seismic profile data analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A model of first-arrival amplitude decay combining geometric spreading, scattering, and inelastic dissipation is derived from a multioffset, 3D vertical seismic profile data set. Unlike the traditional approaches, the model is formulated in terms of path integrals over the rays and without relying on the quality factor (Q) for rocks. The inversion reveals variations of geometric attenuation (wavefront curvatures and scattering, γ) and the effective attenuation parameter (κ) with depth. Both of these properties are also found to be anisotropic. Scattering and geometric spreading (focusing and defocusing) significantly affect seismic amplitudes at lower frequencies and shallower depths. Statistical analysis of model uncertainties quantitatively measures the significance of these results. The model correctly predicts the observed frequency-dependent first-arrival amplitudes at all frequencies. This and similar models can be applied to other types of waves and should be useful for true-amplitude studies, including inversion, inverse Q-filtering, and amplitude variations with offset analysis. With further development of petrophysical models of internal friction and elastic scattering, attenuation parameters γ and κ should lead to constraints on local heterogeneity and intrinsic physical properties of the rock. These parameters can also be used to build models of the traditional frequency-dependent Q for forward and inverse numerical viscoelastic modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".