MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

T<sub>2</sub>‐Weighted MRI Correlates with Long‐Term Histopathology, Neurology Scores, and Skilled Motor Behavior in a Rat Stroke Model

2001· article· en· W2089854608 on OpenAlexaff
Gene C. Palmer, James Peeling, Dale Corbett, Marc R. Del Bigio, Thomas J. Hudzik

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesionMedicineHistopathologyMagnetic resonance imagingForelimbStroke (engine)Motor cortexCortex (anatomy)PathologyNeurologyRadiologyAnatomyNeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intraluminal suture model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in the Sprague Dawley strain of rats characteristically results in an inconsistently sized brain lesion. The purpose of the investigation reported here was to determine whether there were strong point-to-point correlations between the degree of cortical lesion size, as assessed in vivo using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and corresponding cortical lesion size using routine histopathological techniques. Moreover, we aimed to investigate if cortical lesion size as determined by these two modalities correlates with neurological and/or skilled motor deficits observed in individual animals. Baseline behavioral scores were obtained on the animals prior to receiving 60 min of transient MCAO. Following MCAO, animals were tested for 1-21 days for neurological deficits. T2-weighted MRIs of the cortex were taken at two and seven days post-MCAO. At 30 and 60 days the rats were retested for forelimb dexterity in the staircase test. Subsequently, the cortex was examined for histopathological damage. Indeed, there were highly significant correlations between lesion size determined by MRI and histopathology. The degree of cortical damage observed in the T2-weighted MRI, as well as the size of the histopathological lesions were, in turn, highly correlated with the degrees of deficiencies observed in the composite neurological assessments and with the deficits involving skilled use of the contralateral forepaw (damaged side).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207