Ultrastructural Analysis of the Rugose Cell Envelope of a Member of the Pasteurellaceae Family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial membranes serve as selective environmental barriers and contain determinants required for bacterial colonization and survival. Cell envelopes of Gram-negative bacteria consist of an outer and an inner membrane separated by a periplasmic space. Most Gram-negative bacteria display a smooth outer surface (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae), whereas members of the Pasteurellaceae and Moraxellaceae families show convoluted surfaces. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, an oral pathogen representative of the Pasteurellaceae family, displays a convoluted membrane morphology. This phenotype is associated with the presence of morphogenesis protein C (MorC). Inactivation of the morC gene results in a smooth membrane appearance when visualized by two-dimensional (2D) electron microscopy. In this study, 3D electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy of whole-mount bacterial preparations as well as 3D electron microscopy of ultrathin sections of high-pressure frozen and freeze-substituted specimens were used to characterize the membranes of both wild-type and morC mutant strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans. Our results show that the mutant strain contains fewer convolutions than the wild-type bacterium, which exhibits a higher curvature of the outer membrane and a periplasmic space with 2-fold larger volume/area ratio than the mutant bacterium. The inner membrane of both strains has a smooth appearance and shows connections with the outer membrane, as revealed by visualization and segmentation of 3D tomograms. The present studies and the availability of genetically modified organisms with altered outer membrane morphology make A. actinomycetemcomitans a model organism for examining membrane remodeling and its implications in antibiotic resistance and virulence in the Pasteurellaceae and Moraxellaceae bacterial families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".