Ligand-dependent Conformational Changes in the Clamp Region of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global conformational changes in the three-dimensional structure of the Ca 2+ release channel/ryanodine receptor (RyR) occur upon ligand activation. A number of ligands are able to activate the RyR channel, but whether these structurally diverse ligands induce the same or different conformational changes in the channel is largely unknown. Here we constructed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based probe by inserting a CFP after residue Ser-2367 and a YFP after residue Tyr-2801 in the cardiac RyR (RyR2) to yield a CFP- and YFP-dual labeled RyR2 (RyR2 Ser-2367-CFP/Tyr-2801-YFP ). Both of these insertion sites have previously been mapped to the "clamp" region in the four corners of the square-shaped cytoplasmic assembly of the three-dimensional structure of RyR2. Using this novel FRET probe, we monitored the extent of conformational changes in the clamp region of RyR2 Ser-2367-CFP/Tyr-2801-YFP induced by various ligands. We also monitored the extent of Ca 2+ release induced by the same ligands in HEK293 cells expressing RyR2 Ser-2367-CFP/Tyr-2801-YFP . We detected conformational changes in the clamp region for the ligands caffeine, aminophylline, theophylline, ATP, and ryanodine but not for Ca 2+ or 4-chloro- m -cresol, although they all induced Ca 2+ release. Interestingly, caffeine is able to induce further conformational changes in the clamp region of the ryanodine-modified channel, suggesting that ryanodine does not lock RyR in a fixed conformation. Our data demonstrate that conformational changes in the clamp region of RyR are ligand-dependent and suggest the existence of multiple ligand dependent RyR activation mechanisms associated with distinct conformational changes. Background: Global structural changes occur in the ryanodine receptor (RyR) upon ligand activation. Results: Different ligands induce different conformational changes in the clamp region of RyR. Conclusion: Conformational changes in the clamp region of RyR are ligand-dependent. Significance: RyR possesses multiple, ligand-dependent gating mechanisms associated with distinct structural changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".