MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090041944 · doi:10.1128/jb.02372-14

Altering the Divalent Metal Ion Preference of RNase E

2014· article· en· W2090041944 on OpenAlexafffund
Katharine J. Thompson, Jeff Zong, George A. Mackie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsRNase PEndoribonucleaseDivalentRNase HBiologyBiochemistryMutantEnzymeRNARNase PHChelationMetalChemistryInorganic chemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNase E is a major intracellular endoribonuclease in many bacteria and participates in most aspects of RNA processing and degradation. RNase E requires a divalent metal ion for its activity. We show that only Mg(2+) and Mn(2+) will support significant rates of activity in vitro against natural RNAs, with Mn(2+) being preferred. Both Mg(2+) and Mn(2+) also support cleavage of an oligonucleotide substrate with similar kinetic parameters for both ions. Salts of Ni(2+) and Zn(2+) permitted low levels of activity, while Ca(2+), Co(3+), Cu(2+), and Fe(2+) did not. A mutation to one of the residues known to chelate Mg(2+), D346C, led to almost complete loss of activity dependent on Mg(2+); however, the activity of the mutant enzyme was fully restored by the presence of Mn(2+) with kinetic parameters fully equivalent to those of wild-type enzyme. A similar mutation to the other chelating residue, D303C, resulted in nearly full loss of activity regardless of metal ion. The properties of RNase E D346C enabled a test of the ionic requirements of RNase E in vivo. Plasmid shuffling experiments showed that both rneD303C (i.e., the rne gene encoding a D-to-C change at position 303) and rneD346C were inviable whether or not the selection medium was supplied with MnSO4, implying that RNase E relies on Mg(2+) exclusively in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207