MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090066712 · doi:10.1118/1.3612047

SU-E-T-96: Toward Absolute Dose Measuments Using Radiochromic Film

2011· article· en· W2090066712 on OpenAlexaff
F. Girard, Hugo Bouchard, Frédéric Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRadiation Effects and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceRelative humidityScannerDosimetryHumidityIonization chamberOpticsOptical densityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear medicineIonizationPhysicsChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To identify and quantify factors that can influence radiochromic film dose response and to determine whether they are suitable for absolute dose measurements. Methods: The effect of the film storage temperature was investigated by comparing the performance of three lots of Gafchromic EBT2 films (ISP Corp. inc.) stored either at 4°C or at room temperature. The effect of ambient humidity was determined by placing the films in a sealed container in the presence of either a bath of water or drierite desiccant. The resulting ambient humidity was above 80% or below 20% respectively. The effect of the scanning temperature was determined by mounting a custom made temperature controlled reflecting slab on top of the scanner bed. For absolute dose comparisons, the output of a Varian linac was measured using an Exradin A12 ionization chamber. Results: Storing the film at 4°C improves stability of the film over time but does not eliminate film autodevelopment. Relative humidity variations from 80% to 20% have a strong impact on the optical density (4% difference for an optical density of 0.5) and could introduce dose errors of 15%. During the scanning procedure, the film temperature influences the optical density measured (0.1% per °C for an optical density of 0.5). When controlling these parameters, the absolute dose difference between EBT2 and the A12 chamber is 3% or less over a dose range of 20–350 cGy. Conclusions: Humidity is the dominant factor that influences film dose response and must be controlled. The scanning temperature influences the optical density of the film to a lesser degree. Storing EBT2 at low temperature reduces the autodevelopment of the film, but cannot fully prevent it. When controlling for these parameters, absolute dose measurements can be performed to an uncertainty of 3%. This work has been supported by the Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant No. 357402.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Effects and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207