MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090068856 · doi:10.2322/tastj.10.ph_1

Numerical Simulation of the Dissolution Process of GaSb into InSb Melt under Normal and Microgravity Conditions

2012· article· en· W2090068856 on OpenAlexaff
Youhei Takagi, Natsuki Suzuki, Yasunori Okano, Akira Tanaka, Y. Hayakawa, S. Dost

Bibliographic record

VenueTRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsDissolutionLiquidusConvectionSolidusMaterials scienceCrystal growthDiffusionMass transferSuccinonitrilePhase diagramNatural convectionCrystal (programming language)ThermodynamicsMechanicsPhase (matter)ChemistryPhysicsMetallurgyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperature Gradient Growth experiments of InxGa1-xSb will be performed on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2012. In the GaSb/InSb/GaSb-sandwich system used, before growth, the dissolution process of GaSb into InSb takes place during the formation of the growth solution (melt). Solutal mass transport occurring during dissolution plays a significant role. In crystal growth on Earth, the large difference between the densities of InSb and GaSb leads to gravitational segregation in the melt and axial non-uniformity in crystal composition. In addition, the large separation between the liquidus and solidus curves in the phase diagram of this system further contributes to compositional non-uniformity. In order to have a better understanding for the effect of gravity on solutal transport during in this system, the dissolution process was numerically simulated under both Earth’s gravity and a microgravity level on the ISS. Numerical simulations showed that under Earth’s gravity, dissolution of the GaSb seed was enhanced due to the contribution of solutal natural convection. However, under microgravity diffusion mass transport was dominant in the melt, and the contribution of natural convection was not significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPANSame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207