Differences in intestinal mucin dynamics between germ-free and conventionally reared chickens after mannan-oligosaccharide supplementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A germ-free (GF) chicken model was used to test 2 hypotheses: 1. microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) influences mucin gene expression and mucin types; and 2. mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) supplementation affects GIT cells directly, without bacteria mediation, compared with bacterial-mediated effect (i.e., indirectly). Gnotobiotic isolators were used: 1) GF, 2) with a single bacteria population, and 3) conventionalized by exposure to cecal bacterial contents. Each was divided to 2 diet groups: with or without MOS (2 kg/t) for 1 wk. Results show that the absence of bacteria in the GIT caused a reduction in neutral and acidic goblet cell (GC) number and density, an increase in sulfated mucin, absence of sialylated GC, and reduced mucin 2 mRNA expression in the small intestine of GF compared with conventional birds. These results indicate a reduced development of mucin production and secretion in the absence of GIT bacteria implying a less mature small intestine mucosa, supporting our first hypothesis. Results from the single bacteria population group were not conclusive and did not support any of the hypotheses. Supplementation of MOS, regardless of microbial presence, caused a reduction in neutral GC number and density but increased neutral GC area. The MOS caused different effects on acidic mucins in conventional and GF birds, causing a reduction in sialylated GC number (conventional) and a reduction in sulfated GC density (GF), all supporting a direct effect of MOS in GF animals, in addition to an indirect effect via gut microflora.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".