MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090110906 · doi:10.1532/hsf98.2014305

Is Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Superior to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery on Postoperative Paradoxical Ventricular Septal Motion?

2014· article· en· W2090110906 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murat Günday, Mete Alpaslan, Özgür Çiftçi, Mehmet Özülkü, Gülay Çopur, Sait Aşlamacı

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Heart Surgery Forum · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyIntensive care unitInternal medicineCoronary artery bypass surgeryPerfusionOdds ratioCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyPleural effusionArterySurgeryBypass surgeryMyocardial infarctionAngina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><strong>Background</strong>: The aims of this study were to investigate the appearance of paradoxical ventricular septal motion (PSM) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to identify factors that might be related to this abnormality.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: This prospective study included 119 consecutive patients (38 women, 81 men) who underwent CABG. Patients who underwent on-pump surgery (22 women, 45 men) and patients who underwent off-pump surgery (16 women, 36 men) were studied separately. All subjects underwent preoperative angiographic septal perfusion evaluation, pre- and postoperative echocardiography, and standard electrocardiographic and laboratory investigations, including troponin I and CK-MB levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed for a variety of related parameters.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Significant differences in EuroSCORE, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, PSM (assessed using echocardiography), septal perfusion (observed using preoperative angiography), postoperative pleural effusion, and intensive care unit recidivism were observed between the two groups (<em>P</em> < .05). Moreover, postoperative PSM was correlated with septal perfusion (<em>r</em> = -0.687<sup>**</sup>, <em>P</em> < .001), type of operation (<em>r</em> = -0.194<sup>*</sup>, <em>P</em> = .035), diabetes mellitus (<em>r</em> = 0.273<sup>**</sup>, <em>P</em> = .003), carotid stenosis (<em>r</em> = 0.235<sup>*</sup>, <em>P</em> = .011), the number of distal anastomoses (<em>r</em> = 0.245<sup>**</sup>, <em>P</em> = .008), pleural effusion (<em>r</em> = 0.193<sup>*</sup>, <em>P</em> = .037), and intensive care unit recidivism (<em>r</em> = 0.249<sup>**</sup>, <em>P</em> = .007). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that only preoperative septal perfusion (odds ratio: 0.037; 95% confidence interval: 0.011-0.128; <em>P</em> < .05) constitutes an independent risk factor for PSM (<em>P</em> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: This study demonstrated that preoperative septal perfusion deficiency represents an independent risk factor for postoperative PSM in patients undergoing CABG. Further investigations addressing the timing of the appearance of PSM and the correlation of this finding with perfusion imaging studies may provide new details concerning the mechanisms that underlie this abnormality.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Heart Surgery ForumSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207