Brain injury following neuroleptic malignant syndrome: Case report and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of brain injury following neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and review the literature for similar documented cases. CASE REPORT: A 30-year old woman presented to the ER with psychotic features and was treated with several anti-psychotics. Subsequently, she developed neurological symptoms and was diagnosed with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Following a prolonged course in an acute care facility, she was admitted to a rehabilitation ward, where cognitive and physical examinations revealed significant findings. These included marked dysarthria, difficulties comprehending commands, attention problems, as well as abnormalities in her muscle tone, power, reflexes, gait, co-ordination and sensory function. CONCLUSION: Literature reviews reveal few documented cases of brain injury following neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A further exploration of the effects of NMS on the brain is warranted to elicit whether cerebellar damage is indeed common following neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Such research could eventually lead to therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing permanent brain injury in persons with NMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".