Comparison of feline core bone marrow biopsies from different sites using 2 techniques and needles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Commonly used 11ga or 13ga biopsy needles are relatively large for cats and often preclude successful collection of bone marrow (BM) core biopsies. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare 15ga to 13ga BM core biopsy ease of collection and specimen quality. METHODS: In 10 cats, humeral biopsies obtained with 15ga EZ-IO needles were compared with iliac biopsies obtained with 13ga Jamshidi needles. Body condition, ease of collection, section quality, postprocedure pain, and swelling at biopsy sites were scored. Specimen length on mounted slides was measured and specimens with quality scores of 3-5 out of a maximum value of 5 were considered to be of acceptable diagnostic quality. The distribution of all parameters was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk tests, and differences in parameters were assessed by ANCOVA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between 15ga and 13ga biopsies, except that the 15ga humeral biopsy was judged to be easier to perform than 13ga iliac biopsy, and there was more severe postbiopsy swelling with 13ga biopsies. Facility score (mean ± SD), section quality score (median ± SD) and specimen length (mm, mean ± SD) were 12.7 ± 2.3, 2.0 ± 1.4, and 6.0 ± 2.1 for 15ga biopsies, respectively, and 8.9 ± 2.4, 1.0 ± 1.8, and 7.5 ± 2.5 for 13ga biopsies, respectively. Three specimens of acceptable quality were obtained with each 15ga and 13ga biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: In cats, BM biopsy of the humerus with a 15ga needle is easier and causes less postbiopsy swelling than biopsy of the ilium with a 13ga needle. Sites and needles are equivalent with respect to yielding specimens of acceptable quality. Neither technique consistently captured high-quality specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".