Platelet and other tests followed sequentially for 14 days after operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nineteen patients were studied twice before and sequentially from 1 h to 14 days after operations lasting about 1 h. Eighteen tests were carried out, ideally on all the nine occasions blood collections were planned. Only significant changes are summarized. Immediately after the operation the plasma PF4 and beta TG were raised in parallel suggesting some platelet 'release' had occurred. At this time platelet aggregation to ADP and collagen had decreased by 57% to 64% and the plasma cyclic AMP had doubled. Next day these abnormalities had returned towards normal. By day 2 the fibrinogen and the heparin neutralizing activity were maximal; they returned towards normal by day 14. On day 14, when presumably all platelets present at operation had been removed the new platelets were 53% more numerous and 9.5% smaller; they contained 23% less PF4 and 42% less serotonin and 5-HT uptake was decreased, but the total amount of 5-HT and PF4 in the circulation probably remained constant. In summary these operations transitorily upset platelet function for a few hours and the platelets formed postoperatively were abnormal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".