Psychophysiological Disorders in Anxious Patients: Hypertension and Hypotension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anxious patients have a higher incidence than the general population for cardiovascular disorders and sudden death. Several studies have emphasized abnormal pulse rate, abnormal heart response conditioning, high incidence of arrhythmia, and abnormal blood pressure. Essential hypertension has been studied in relation to stress, and chronic hypotension ('low blood pressure syndrome') has been clinically recognized for decades, but rarely systematically studied. We investigated these abnormal blood pressures in anxious patients, during controlled trials with 80 patients having generalized anxiety disorder as defined in DSM III, for at least 6 months duration, and of moderate to severe intensity. They were randomly assigned to placebo, or bromazepam, 18 mg/day. Blood pressure, pulse, and several other measurements were taken on a weekly basis for 2 months (washout phase--1 week, treatment phase--4 weeks, and withdrawal phase--3 weeks). One third of these patients had an abnormal blood pressure (hypertension or hypotension) while untreated, and this is statistically significant when compared to a matched control group of nonanxious patients. Bromazepam improved several patients having either hypertension or chronic hypotension. These findings are relevant for long-term treatment of anxious patients, since cardiovascular psychosomatic complications are a major health problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".