MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090364042 · doi:10.1139/b05-145

Seasonal pattern of leaf production and its effects on assimilation in giant summer-green herbs in deciduous forests in northern Japan

2006· article· en· W2090364042 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tomokazu Tani, Gaku Kudo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeciduousCanopyBiologyBotanyPhotosynthesisUnderstoryPhotosynthetic capacityLeaf area indexTree canopyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understory vegetation of northern deciduous forests in far eastern Asia is characterized by giant summer-green herbs. We examined the patterns of height growth, leaf accumulation, photosynthetic characteristics, daily net assimilation, and dry matter allocation within aboveground parts of six giant summer-green herbs with reference to light conditions in deciduous forests. Plant height, leaf number, and total leaf area per plant increased with progressing tree-canopy closure in five species ( Cacalia hastata L. subsp. orientalis Kitam., Cirsium kamtschaticum Ledeb., Filipendula kamtschatica (Pall.) Maxim. f. kamtschatica, Senecio cannabifolius Less., and Urtica platyphylla Wedd.) that had continuous leaf production throughout the growing season, whereas one species ( Veratrum album L. subsp. oxysepalum Hulten) with early leaf production, completed leaf production mostly before the beginning of tree-canopy closure. Maximum photosynthetic and dark respiration rates decreased seasonally in all species. Species with continuous leaf emergence accumulated leaves acclimatized to shade conditions, which offset the decreasing photosynthesis of individual leaves with progressing tree-canopy closure, resulting in stable carbon gain even under decreasing light availability. In contrast, V. album assimilated vigorously during the short period of high irradiance before tree-canopy closure, and decreased its assimilation rate continuously thereafter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207