MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090373196 · doi:10.1130/focus122010.1

Precambrian and Phanerozoic postglacial processes

2010· article· en· W2090373196 on OpenAlexaff
Grant M. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecambrianPhanerozoicGeologyPaleontologyEarth scienceCenozoicStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From their investigation of the Late Ordovician Soom Shale, Gabbott et al. (2010, p. 1103 in this issue of Geology) have produced an extremely detailed account of important relationships between sedimentological and organic processes during the dying phases of the short-lived Hirnantian glaciation in South Africa. They suggest that eolian input played a key role in stimulating growth of phytoplankton, so that bottom sediments were characterized by unusual aggregates of silt-size grains intimately associated with organic material. These organic-rich silty layers and lenses occur together with inorganic mudstone laminae deposited from nepheloid plumes and weak turbidity currents thought to be associated with fl uvial input. In seeking an explanation for the remarkable preservation of fossilized metazoan organisms in the Soom Shale Lagerstatte, they suggest that organic productivity, stimulated by introduction of eolian material, may have played a pivotal role in the development of eutrophication and anoxic bottom conditions. This interesting account draws on disparate lines of evidence to bring into focus a rare picture illustrating interactions between sedimentological and organic processes during a very special period accompanying the rapid demise of an ice sheet. Gabbott et al.’s detailed investigation begs the question of what evidence we have regarding conditions following older, possibly much more prolonged and extensive, glaciations, when the composition of Earth’s atmosphere was probably different and organic evolution was at a much more primitive stage—for example, when there were no land plants or metazoans. In this different world, was deglaciation accompanied by the development of anoxic conditions? Was there signifi cant eolian input because of the dearth of terrestrial plants? How may the Snowball Earth hypothesis (SEH) contribute to our understanding of ancient postglacial events? How do Neoproterozoic banded iron formations and postglacial “cap carbonates” fi t into the picture, and how do we accommodate the accumulating evidence from stable isotopes? There are many questions, but few satisfactory answers. The following is an attempt to briefl y consider some aspects of postglacial phenomena throughout geological time. Most studies of Quaternary and recent glacial deposits are, for practical reasons, carried out in terrestrial settings (Martini, 1997), but the majority of ancient glacial sedimentary rocks are marine. Inasmuch as they can be accurately read from the fragmentary sedimentary rock record, climatic conditions on Earth appear to have fl uctuated dramatically throughout its long history. In fact, it could be argued that most organic evolution (including the emergence of our own species) occurred in response to climatically induced environmental pressures. Among the most easily recognized paleoclimatic signals are those of ancient glaciations. The criteria are simple and few: the presence of striated rock or sediment surfaces beneath suspected glacial deposits; the occurrence of widespread diamictites—conglomerates with clasts scattered through an abundant matrix; dropstones, which are large, isolated rock fragments in fi nely bedded sedimentary rocks; and ancient varved deposits that record annual freeze-and-thaw cycles in ancient lakes. There are many caveats and more sophisticated criteria, but the fi eld observations are critical. Existing data suggest that, during its ~4.6 g.y. history, signifi cant por

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207