MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090394104 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070556

A Computational Exploration of the Interactions of the Green Tea Polyphenol (–)-Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate with Cardiac Muscle Troponin C

2013· article· en· W2090394104 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dominic Botten, Giorgia Fugallo, Franca Fraternali, Carla Molteni

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTea Polyphenols and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of EdinburghImperial College LondonOffice of ScienceKing's College LondonUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsTroponin ITroponin CPolyphenolTroponinBiophysicsEpigallocatechin gallateChemistryBiochemistryBiologyMedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thanks to its polyphenols and phytochemicals, green tea is believed to have a number of health benefits, including protecting from heart disease, but its mechanism of action at the molecular level is still not understood. Here we explore, by means of atomistic simulations, how the most abundant of the green tea polyphenols, (-)-Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate (EGCg), interacts with the structural C terminal domain of cardiac muscle troponin C (cCTnC), a calcium binding protein that plays an important role in heart contractions. We find that EGCg favourably binds to the hydrophobic cleft of cCTnC consistently with solution NMR experiments. It also binds to cCTnC in the presence of the anchoring region of troponin I (cTnI(34-71)) at the interface between the E and H helices. This appears to affect the strength of the interaction between cCTnC and cTnI(34-71) and also counter-acts the effects of the Gly159Asp mutation, related to dilated cardiomyopathy. Our simulations support the picture that EGCg interacting with the C terminal domain of troponin C may help in regulating the calcium signalling either through competitive binding with the anchoring domain of cTnI or by affecting the interaction between cCTnC and cTnI(34-71).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicTea Polyphenols and EffectsFrench-language works237,207