MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090396477 · doi:10.1159/000184093

Staphylococcal Epidermidis Infection of a Hemodialysis Button-Graft Complex Controlled by Vancomycin for 11 Months

2008· article· en· W2090396477 on OpenAlexaff
Henry Gault, William Costerton, Michael D. Paul, Patrick S. Parfrey, L. Purchase

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStaphylococcus epidermidisVancomycinHemodialysisSurgeryPeritoneal dialysisPeritonitisContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisDialysisTransplantationStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 54 year old woman had a Bentley DiaTAP button implanted in her thigh for hemodialysis access. She had been started on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) because of intractable vascular access problems. Unfortunately, CAPD had to be discontinued because of fungal peritonitis. Transplantation had not been possible because of circulating cytotoxic antibodies. The prosthetic complex soon became infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis and blood cultures were intermittently positive for 11 months. However, with continuing vancomycin therapy she remained in her usual state of health, without side effects from vancomycin, until venous thrombosis resolved and it became possible to remove the infected prosthetic complex and implant a button in an arm. As a last resort, it may be possible to maintain a patient on dialysis in reasonable health with a DiaTAP button graft complex infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis and intermittent positive blood cultures using long term vancomycin therapy. Such management probably would not be appropriate for any other organism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207