MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090419242 · doi:10.1121/1.4708470

Stabilization of time-domain acoustic boundary element method for sound radiation problems

2012· article· en· W2090419242 on OpenAlexaff
Hae-Won Jang, Jeong–Guon Ih

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary element methodMathematical analysisMathematicsTime domainInstabilityHelmholtz equationAcoustic radiationBoundary value problemBoundary (topology)Helmholtz free energyIntegral equationPhysicsFinite element methodMechanicsRadiationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-domain acoustic solution from the Kirchhoff integral equation for the exterior problem is not unique due to the presence of fictitious internal modes and also suffers from the instability that stems from the time marching scheme. In this work, methods to stabilize the time-domain acoustic boundary element calculation were suggested. Low-order fictitious internal modes within the effective frequency range of boundary element calculation were suppressed by the newly formulated time-domain CHIEF (Combined Helmholtz Integral Equation Formulation) method. Additional interior points were included, similar to frequency-domain problems, to satisfy the zero pressure constraint considering the shortest retarded time between boundary nodes and interior points. However, the calculation was yet unstable due to remaining unstable high-order modes beyond the effective frequency limit. To further stabilize the computation, unstable high-order internal modes were nullified using the wave vector filtering method. In comparison with the time-domain Burton-Miller formulation, the proposed method has no hyper-singular integral and the monotonically increasing instability was not observed. As a test example, sound radiation from a pulsating sphere was used and a good stabilization performance was shown. Average relative-difference norm of the stabilized time response from the analytic solution was 2.7%. (This work was partially supported by BK21 project)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207