MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Consumption of 100% Fruit Juice and Risk of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004

2010· article· en· W2090485006 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Pereira, Victor L. Fulgoni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Nutrition · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyObesityFruit juiceMetabolic syndromeFood scienceEnvironmental healthConsumption (sociology)MedicineHealth examinationBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The health effects of added sugars have received much attention, but few studies have examined the association between foods that naturally contain sugar, such as 100% fruit juice, and risk of obesity and related conditions. Therefore, our purpose was to study the association between 100% fruit juice intake and risk of obesity and metabolic syndrome in a representative sample of the U.S. population. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of a multiethnic sample of U.S. adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 was undertaken to examine the association between 100% fruit juice consumption and the odds of obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) and metabolic syndrome (Adult Treatment Panel [ATP] III definition). We used logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds of obesity and metabolic syndrome per category of fruit juice consumption exposure, while adjusting for covariates that may be confounders of this association. RESULTS: Of 14,196 adults included in the sample, 3961 were consumers of fruit juice. Consumers of 100% fruit juice, relative to nonconsumers, had lower mean BMI, lower waist circumference, and lower homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) insulin resistance (p < 0.001). Level of intake (oz/d) had a linear inverse association with HOMA (p < 0.001), whereas the association with BMI and waist circumference was U-shaped (p < 0.001). Consumers relative to nonconsumers had 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13%-30%) lower odds of obesity and 15% (95% CI = 10%-28%) lower odds of metabolic syndrome. After adjustment for demographics and lifestyle factors, the lower odds of obesity remained statistically significant, but a statistically significant reduction in odds of metabolic syndrome was no longer noted. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonconsumers, those who consumed 100% fruit juice were leaner, were more insulin sensitive, and had lower odds of obesity and metabolic syndrome. The association with metabolic syndrome was explained primarily by other lifestyle factors, while the association with obesity remained independent. Experimental studies are needed to determine whether any direct physiologic link exists between consumption of 100% fruit juice and lower risks for obesity and metabolic syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of NutritionSame topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207