MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090502768 · doi:10.2118/153064-ms

Reserves and Performance Comparisons of Multi-Fractured Spearfish Horizontal Wells, to Various Fracturing Techniques and Well Spacing Configurations

2012· article· en· W2090502768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectional drillingGeologyDrillingFracture (geology)Petroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Completion (oil and gas wells)Oil productionHydraulic fracturingWell stimulationDrainageHorizontal and verticalProduction (economics)Geotechnical engineeringReservoir engineeringPetroleumEngineeringGeodesyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The light oil bearing, low permeability, Spearfish formation, in Southwest Manitoba, Canada, has been a recent target of extensive horizontal drilling and fracture stimulation. An extensive completion database, along with historical production data, is available in the public domain. It is beneficial to review what the production trends illustrate about this play, in order to optimize the development of other similar types of low permeability sandstone plays, with regards to horizontal well spacing and fracture design. Decline analysis was performed on over 120 horizontal wells that had sufficient completion information available, to study the effects of varying fracture spacing and size. The emphasis was to review the longer term production histories of the oil wells, as well as the predicted ultimate reserves, and see if there were any discernible trends, when production was compared to various fracture parameters. Both the initial production rates and the ultimate reserves, showed significant data scatter when compared with fracture size, and number of fractures per well. It was difficult to make strong conclusions about initial production rates, being a function of varying fracture parameters. Closer analysis of individual wells, suggests that ultimate reserves appears related to the moveable oil-in-place, within the drainage area that a horizontal well produces from. It appears that well spacing effects and localized reservoir properties, must be taken into consideration, when analyzing the long-term performance of multi-fractured horizontal wells. It seems that caution is required, when drawing long-term conclusions from initial production results. The basic reservoir engineering principle of an oil well draining a defined reservoir volume, are still applicable to low permeability reservoirs. There appears to be a finite number of horizontal wells that can be drilled in any given area, and an optimum number of fracture stimulations that can be placed per well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it