MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090652060 · doi:10.1002/btpr.17

Simpler noninstrumented batch and semicontinuous cultures provide mammalian cell kinetic data comparable to continuous and perfusion cultures

2008· article· en· W2090652060 on OpenAlexafffund
Olivier Henry, Ezra Kwok, James M. Piret

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPerfusionChemistryMicrobiologyBiologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perfusion culture optimization in multiple noninstrumented small-scale flasks allows reduced expense and time associated with process development. These cultures normally use a different process mode because at small scales it is not practical to retain the cells for medium perfusion. In this work, the kinetics of growth, nutrient consumption, metabolite, and product formation were compared in spinner cultures operated in batch, semicontinuous, chemostat, and perfusion modes. Fed-batch was also included to provide an added comparison. Using logistic fitting for more reliable specific rate estimates in transient conditions, the growth phase of batch cultures predicted similar kinetics to fed-batch and continuous processes. For daily medium exchange rates up to 50%, the semicontinuous mode also predicted the perfusion process kinetics. Differences between the chemostat and semicontinuous culture results were only observed at higher exchange rates with the greatest daily culture perturbation. Overall, the batch or semicontinuous cultures were shown to readily provide results similar to the far more complex to operate chemostat or perfusion cultures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207