Identification and characterization of a new carbonic anhydrase in the marine diatom <i>Phaeodactylum tricornutum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cDNA encoding a new isoenzyme of β-type carbonic anhydrase (CA; EC 4.2.1.1) in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin has been cloned. The cDNA contained an open reading frame of 819 bp, which encodes a polypeptide of 273 amino acids. This gene, which is designated as ptca2, was found to be highly homologous (83% at the nucleotide level) to the previously isolated intracellular β-CA gene from Phaeodactylum tricornutum (ptca1). Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of ptca2 with β-CAs from other sources demonstrated that PtCA2 possesses the completely conserved zinc coordination residues of β-CA. The N-terminus 19 amino acid sequence of PtCA2 was predicted to be an endoplasmic reticulum-targeting signal, suggesting localization of the protein in an organelle or in the periplasmic space. Quantitative analysis of mRNA accumulation of ptca2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed a significant level of mRNA accumulation even under 5% CO 2 and a 3.5-fold increase in accumulation upon acclimation of the diatom to air. This indicates that ptca2 belongs to a constitutive class of enzyme that responds only weakly to the ambient CO 2 concentration. The sequences of both ptca1 and ptca2 were shown to be grouped into a phylogeny that is composed of mixture of sequences from the eucarya and procarya domains, including sequences from the red alga Porphyridium purpureum, the green alga Coccomyxa, the red mold Neurospora crassa, and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Key words: carbonic anhydrase, marine diatom, inorganic carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM), Phaeodactylum tricornutum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".