Innervation of the Pars intermedia and Control of Alpha-Melanotropin Secretion in the Newt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study we have investigated the presence of nerve fibers containing dopamine, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the pars intermedia of the crested newt and we have examined the possible effect of these neurohormones on the release of alpha-melanotropin (alpha-MSH) by neurointermediate lobes in vitro. By means of immunohistochemistry, we observed the presence of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-immunoreactive fibers in the pars intermedia of the crested newt. Using a specific antiserum to dopamine, these fibers appeared to be mainly dopaminergic in nature. Unlike anurans, urodele amphibians do not exhibit TRH or NPY-like immunoreactivity in the pars intermedia. A perifusion system technique for newt pituitaries was developed to investigate the effect of dopamine, TRH and NPY on alpha-MSH secretion. Administration of increasing concentrations of dopamine (from 10(-9) to 10(-5)M) induced a dose-related inhibition of alpha-MSH release. This inhibitory effect was mimicked by the dopamine agonist apomorphine (10(-6)M). In contrast, the secretory activity of the newt pars intermedia was not affected by administration of synthetic TRH or NPY (up to 10(-7) and 10(-6)M, respectively). These results indicate that the neurotransmitter dopamine likely plays a pivotal role in the regulation of melanotropin secretion in urodele amphibians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".