Deposition of TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles onto Silica Measured Using a Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles introduced into subsurface environments may lead to contamination of drinking water supplies and can act as colloidal carriers for sorbed contaminants. A model laboratory system was used to examine the influence of water chemistry on the physicochemical properties of TiO2 nanoparticles and their deposition. Deposition rates of TiO2 particles onto a silica surface were measured over a broad range of solution conditions (pH and ionic strength) using a quartz crystal microbalance with energy dissipation monitoring (QCM-D). Higher particle deposition rates were observed under favorable interaction conditions (i.e., in the presence of attractive electrostatic interactions) in comparison to unfavorable deposition conditions where electrostatic repulsion dominates particle-surface interactions. Nanoparticle sizes were characterized by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). These analyses confirmed the nanoscale of the system under study as well as the presence of TiO2 aggregates in some cases. TiO2 deposition behavior onto silica measured using QCM-D was generally found to be in qualitative agreement with the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory of colloidal stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it