Down-Regulation of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor in Cells Stably Expressing the Constitutively Active Angiotensin II N111G-AT1 Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diverse cellular changes brought about by the expression of a constitutively active receptor are poorly understood. QBI-human embryonic kidney 293A cells stably expressing the constitutively active N111G-AT(1) receptor (N111G cells) showed elevated levels of inositol phosphates and frequent spontaneous intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations. Interestingly, Ca(2+) transients triggered with maximal doses of angiotensin II were much weaker in N111G cells than in wild-type cells. These blunted responses were observed independently of the presence or absence of extracellular Ca(2+) and were also obtained when endogenous muscarinic and purinergic receptors were activated, revealing a heterologous desensitization process. The desensitized component of the Ca(2+) signaling cascade was neither the G protein G(q) nor phospholipase C. The intracellular Ca(2+) store of N111G cells and their mechanism of Ca(2+) entry also appeared to be intact. The most striking adaptive response of N111G cells was a down-regulation of their inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3)R) as revealed by reduced IP(3)-induced Ca(2+) release, lowered [(3)H]IP(3) binding capacity, diminished IP(3)R immunoreactivity, and accelerated IP(3)R degradation involving the lysosomal pathway. Treatment with the inverse agonist EXP3174 reversed the desensitized phenotype of N111G cells. Down-regulation of IP(3)R represents a reversible adaptive response to protect cells against the adverse effects of constitutively active Ca(2+)-mobilizing receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".