MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090831965 · doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2010.08.004

Site-directed mutagenesis combined with oxidative methionine labeling for probing structural transitions of a membrane protein by mass spectrometry

2010· article· en· W2090831965 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Pan, Leonid S. Brown, Lars Konermann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphWestern University
FundersUniversity of California, IrvineNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryMethionine sulfoxideNative stateIsobaric labelingMembrane proteinHelix (gastropod)MethionineMutagenesisProtein foldingProtein structureStereochemistryCrystallographyBiochemistryMembraneElectrospray ionizationChromatographyAmino acidProtein mass spectrometryMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure of the membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin (BR) to SDS induces partial breakdown of the native conformation. The exact structural properties of this SDS state remain a matter of debate, despite its widespread use in BR folding experiments. The current work employs hydroxyl radical (·OH) labeling in conjunction with mass spectrometry (MS)-based peptide mapping for probing the solvent accessibility of individual BR segments in the presence of SDS. Previous work revealed methionine sulfoxide formation to be the dominant oxidative pathway. Those data suggested extensive unfolding of helices A and D in SDS. Unfortunately, the lack of Met residues in helices C and F implies that no direct information on the behavior of the latter two elements could be obtained. Here, we address this problem by employing two variants with additional Met residues, L93M (helix C) and V179M (helix F). The oxidation behavior of the resulting 11 methionines can be grouped into three categories: (1) extensively labeled both in native BR and in SDS (loop residues M32, M68, and M163); (2) protected in the native state but not in SDS (M20, M118); (3) always protected (M56, M60, M93, M145, M179, M209). These data show that a solvent-inaccessible core is retained in SDS. This core consists of partially intact helices B, C, E, F, and G. The termini of these helices are highly dynamic and/or unraveled, particularly on the cytoplasmic side. Overall, this work demonstrates how the use of engineered ·OH labeling sites can provide insights into structural properties of membrane proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometrySame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207