MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090839773 · doi:10.1063/1.1412865

Protein denaturation <i>in vacuo</i>: Mechanism for centrifugal unfolding of neutral lysozyme

2001· article· en· W2090839773 on OpenAlexafffund
Gustavo A. Arteca, O. Tapia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryChemical physicsWork (physics)LysozymeRelaxation (psychology)AnhydrousIntermolecular forcePopulationDenaturation (fissile materials)ThermodynamicsMolecular dynamicsCrystallographyMoleculeComputational chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments on anhydrous proteins diffusing in a low-pressure gas reveal transitions that share common features with the unfolding and refolding processes observed in solution. These phenomena force us to re-evaluate the specific role played by solvent on large-scale protein rearrangements. Computer simulations, in combination with tools for molecular shape analysis, provide insights into in vacuo processes. In this work, we deal with one particular aspect of this problem: the conditions and the mechanism for spontaneous unfolding in a globally neutral protein. When coupling the protein to a simulated thermal bath, the flow of energy between rotational modes and internal modes can produce a centrifugal effect leading to unfolding. Using hen lysozyme as a system, we study the reproducibility of the unfolding transition and its dependence on the bath relaxation constant. In addition, we monitor the evolution of large-scale molecular shape features (e.g., chain entanglements) that take place during unfolding. Our results show that a change in bath relaxation constant affects the time scale of the transition and the population of intermediates, without changing the basic unfolding mechanism. We also discuss possible cycles of unfolding–refolding transitions, and their implications for our understanding of the denatured state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207