The Development of Sensorimotor Reflexes in the Brazilian Opossum Monodelphis domestics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of a number of sensorimotor reflexes was studied in the Brazilian opossum Monodelphis domestica. At birth, an opossum's forelimbs execute rhythmic, alternate movements which resemble swimming, whereas the hindlimbs are little more than embryonic buds that do not move independent of the trunk. It is possible, therefore, to witness the entire development of hindlimb motility, the advent of coordination between forelimbs and hindlimbs, and the development of ambulation. The following sequence in the appearance and maturation of the reflexes was observed: rooting, an innate reflex in mammals which disappears over time; withdrawal of the forelimbs followed by withdrawal of the hindlimbs; crossed extension of the forelimbs and then of the hindlimbs; grasp, the forelimbs preceding the hindlimbs; body righting on a surface; forward hopping of the forelimbs followed by the hindlimbs; lateral and medial hopping of the forelimbs, then the hindlimbs; chin tactile placing; body righting in the air; and, finally, visual placing. Limb tactile placing is not significantly expressed, even in the adult. This behavioral sequence generally matches the sequence of somatic (trunk, limbs, head) and neural (spinal cord and brain) structures involved in the control of these behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it