Correctors promote folding of the CFTR in the endoplasmic reticulum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is most commonly caused by deletion of a residue (DeltaF508) in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) protein. The misfolded mutant protein is retained in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) and is not trafficked to the cell surface (misprocessed mutant). Corrector molecules such as corr-2b or corr-4a are small molecules that increase the amount of functional CFTR at the cell surface. Correctors may function by stabilizing CFTR at the cell surface or by promoting folding in the ER. To test whether correctors promoted folding of CFTR in the ER, we constructed double-cysteine CFTR mutants that would be retained in the ER and only undergo cross-linking when the protein folds into a native structure. The mature form, but not the immature forms, of M348C(TM6)/T1142C(TM12) (where TM is transmembrane segment), T351C(TM6)/T1142C(TM12) and W356C(TM6)/W1145C(TM12) mutants were efficiently cross-linked. Mutations to the COPII (coatamer protein II) exit motif (Y(563)KDAD(567)) were then made in the cross-linkable cysteine mutants to prevent the mutant proteins from leaving the ER. Membranes were prepared from the mutants expressed in the absence or presence of correctors and subjected to disulfide cross-linking analysis. The presence of correctors promoted folding of the mutants as the efficiency of cross-linking increased from approx. 2-5% to 22-35%. The results suggest that correctors interact with CFTR in the ER to promote folding of the protein into a native structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".