MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090917895 · doi:10.1353/fch.2007.0009

Filles d'Acadie, Femmes de Louisbourg: Acadian Women and French Colonial Society in Eighteenth-Century Louisbourg

2007· article· fr· W2090917895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Colonial History · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtColonialismEthnologySociologyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine un groupe de femmes nées en Acadie (Nouvelle-Écosse) qui, ayant épousé des officiers coloniaux français, sont forcées par la conquête anglaise à quitter la colonie, voyager en France, et par la suite, s'établir dans la nouvelle colonie française de l'île Royale (Cap-Breton). Le rôle joué par le genre, la classe sociale et l'identité coloniale dans le processus de transition qui a amené ces femmes de l'Acadie à Louisbourg, ville capitale de l'Île Royale, sera évalué. Cette étude, basée sur les registres coloniaux français et l'inventaire après décès d'une des femmes, remet en question l'idée préconçue des femmes d'élite de Louisbourg comme étant aristocratiques et métropolitaines. De plus, elle remet en question le portrait de la société acadienne d'avant 1755 comme étant sans classes sociales. Ce groupe d'Acadiennes formait la base d'un réseau social à l'Île Royale dont l'importance s'étendait aux relations entre cette colonie et les Acadiens en terre britannique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it