Filles d'Acadie, Femmes de Louisbourg: Acadian Women and French Colonial Society in Eighteenth-Century Louisbourg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine un groupe de femmes nées en Acadie (Nouvelle-Écosse) qui, ayant épousé des officiers coloniaux français, sont forcées par la conquête anglaise à quitter la colonie, voyager en France, et par la suite, s'établir dans la nouvelle colonie française de l'île Royale (Cap-Breton). Le rôle joué par le genre, la classe sociale et l'identité coloniale dans le processus de transition qui a amené ces femmes de l'Acadie à Louisbourg, ville capitale de l'Île Royale, sera évalué. Cette étude, basée sur les registres coloniaux français et l'inventaire après décès d'une des femmes, remet en question l'idée préconçue des femmes d'élite de Louisbourg comme étant aristocratiques et métropolitaines. De plus, elle remet en question le portrait de la société acadienne d'avant 1755 comme étant sans classes sociales. Ce groupe d'Acadiennes formait la base d'un réseau social à l'Île Royale dont l'importance s'étendait aux relations entre cette colonie et les Acadiens en terre britannique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".