MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation and Characterization of a Novel Large Stroke Micromirror

2011· article· en· W2090974225 on OpenAlexaff
Quan Sun, Zong Fu Jiang, Edmond Cretu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsFinite element methodCantileverPiston (optics)Materials scienceVoltageOpticsSpectrum analyzerAcousticsEngineeringStructural engineeringOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the simulation and characterization of a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) micromirror fabricated with PolyMUMPs. The overall diameter of the hexagonal micrimirror, including mirror plate and 3 supporting cantilevers fixed around, is 450um. A 3D model is built in finite element method (FEM) with COMSOL. Simulations of the elevated height of mirror plate, pull-in voltage and eigenfrequency of the micromirror are carried out. The static and dynamic performances of the fabricated micromirror are characterized by Veeco Optical Profiler and Polytek MEMS System Analyzer. The comparison between measurement and simulation exhibits good concordance. Surface topography measurement shows the elevated height and stress-induced concave deformation of mirror plate almost the same scale as demonstrated in FEM simulation. The Pull-In voltages are measured to be around 32V in current-voltage curve which is almost the same as in FEM simulation with one electrode biased. The fundamental resonant frequency is measured to be 4.3k Hz in torsional motion and 4.9k Hz in piston motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207