Development and Evaluation of Controlled Release Bilayer Tablets of Hydrochlorothiazide and Losartan Potassium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present research work was to develop bilayer tablet dosage form containing combination of immediate and sustained matrix prepared from Hydrochlorothiazide (HTZ) and Losartan Potassium (LP) respectively for the treatment of hypertension and its associated complications. Immediate release HTZ was prepared using different superdisintegrants. LP sustained layer was prepared by compression technique. Both pre-compression and post-compression parameters were analyzed for all the tablets. In vitro release studies were carried out as per USP in pH (1.2) and phosphate buffer pH (6.8) using USP-XXI type II. Bilayer tablet (F6) formulated using higher concentration of HPMC K 15 exhibiting higher LP release rate (83.553± 0.22) for the period of 12 h. The In vitrorelease profile of drug from sustained matrix could be best expressed by First order as the plot showed highest linearity (R2 = 0.990) and diffusion was the dominating mechanism of drug release. The stability and FTIR studies are also indicating the absence of strong interaction between drug and polymer and compatibility among them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".