MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091003490 · doi:10.1021/bc050297w

Extension of the Single Amino Acid Chelate Concept (SAAC) to Bifunctional Biotin Analogues for Complexation of the M(CO)<sub>3</sub><sup>+1</sup> Core (M = Tc and Re):  Syntheses, Characterization, Biotinidase Stability, and Avidin Binding

2006· article· en· W2091003490 on OpenAlexaff
Shelly James, Kevin Maresca, Damian G. Allis, John F. Valliant, William C. Eckelman, John W. Babich, Jon Zubieta

Bibliographic record

VenueBioconjugate Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryAvidinBiotinChelationBifunctionalHistidineLysineCysteineStereochemistryAmino acidCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biotin and avidin form one of the most stable complexes known (K(D) = 10(-15) M(-1)) making this pairing attractive for a variety of biomedical applications including targeted radiotherapy. In this application, one of the pair is attached to a targeting molecule, while the other is subsequently used to deliver a radionuclide for imaging and/or therapeutic applications. Recently, we reported a new single amino acid chelate (SAAC) capable of forming stable complexes with Tc(CO)3 or Re(CO)3 cores. We describe here the application of SAAC analogues for the development of a series of novel radiolabeled biotin derivatives capable of forming robust complexes with both Tc and Re. Compounds were prepared through varying modification of the free carboxylic acid group of biotin. Each 99mTc complex of SAAC-biotin was studied for their ability to bind avidin, susceptibility to biotinidase, and specificity for avidin in an in vivo avidin-containing tumor model. The radiochemical stability of the 99mTc(CO)3 complexes was also investigated by challenging each 99mTc-complex with large molar excesses of cysteine and histidine at elevated temperature. All compounds were radiochemically stable for greater than 24 h at elevated temperature in the presence of histidine and cysteine. Both [99mTc(CO)3(L6)]+1 [TcL6; L6 = biotinylamidopropyl-N,N-(dipicolyl)amine] and [99mTc(CO)3(L12a)]+1 (TcL12; L12 = N,N-(dipicolyl)biotinamido-Boc-lysine; TcL12a; L12a = N,N-(dipicolyl)biotinamide-lysine) readily bound to avidin whereas [99mTc(CO)3(L9)]+1 [TcL9; L9 = N,N-(dipicolyl)biotinamine] demonstrated minimal specific binding. TcL6 and TcL9 were resistant to biotinidase cleavage, while TcL12a, which contains a lysine linkage, was rapidly cleaved. The highest uptake in an in vivo avidin tumor model was exhibited by TcL6, followed by TcL9 and TcL12a, respectively. This is likely the result of both intact binding to avidin and resistance to circulating biotinidase. Ligand L6 is the first SAAC analogue of biotin to demonstrate potential as a radiolabeled targeting vector of biotin capable of forming robust radiochemical complexes with both 99mTc and rhenium radionuclides. Computational simulations were performed to assess biotin-derivative accommodation within the binding site of the avidin. These calculations predict that deformation of the surface domain of the binding pocket can occur to accommodate the transition metal-biotin derivatives with negligible changes to the inner-beta-barrel, the region most responsible for binding and retaining biotin and its derivatives. The biological activity and biodistribution of the technetium complexes TcL6, TcL9, and TcL12a were examined in an avidin tumor model. In the avidin bead tumor localization model, TcL6 demonstrated the most favorable localization with a 7:1 ratio of avidin bead implanted muscle versus normal muscle, while TcL9 exhibited a 2:1 ratio. However, TcL9 displayed no specificity for avidin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioconjugate ChemistrySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207