MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091025521 · doi:10.1179/016164107x159243

Histologic and transcriptional assessment of a mild SMA model

2007· article· en· W2091025521 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvia Balabanian, Nathalie H. Gendron, Alex MacKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurological Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSMA*Motor neuronSpinal muscular atrophySMN1BiologyNeuronSpinal cordNeurosciencePathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by survival of motor neuron (SMN) deficiency, leading to specific motor neuron attrition. The time course and molecular pathophysiologic etiology of motor neuron loss observed in SMA remains obscure. Mice heterozygous for Smn show up to 50% motor neuron attrition by 6 months of age and are used as a model for mild SMA in humans. To determine both the rate of cellular loss and the molecular events underlying motor neuron degeneration in SMA, motor neuron counts and mRNA quantification were performed in spinal cords of Smn(+/-) mice and wild-type littermates. Surprisingly, despite the chronic, subclinical nature of motor neuron loss, we find that the bulk of the loss occurs by 5 weeks of age. RNA isolated from the spinal cords of 5 week-old Smn(+/-) mice subjected to microarray analysis reveal alterations in genes involved in RNA metabolism, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation including a general perturbation of transcripts coding for calcium binding proteins. A subset of these changes in expression was further characterized by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis at various time points. Taken together, these results indicate that spinal cord cells present the first signs of the apoptotic process consistent with a response to the stress of Smn depletion. A picture of comparatively rapid neuronal attrition in spite of the very mild nature of SMA is obtained. Furthermore, changes occur, which may be reactive to and not causative of the cellular loss, involving central cellular functions as well as calcium modulating proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurological ResearchSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207