Geochronologic and thermobarometric constraints on the metamorphic history of the Fairbanks Mining District, western Yukon-Tanana terrane, Alaska
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents new petrologic and thermochronologic information from the Fairbanks district of east central Alaska that indicate a complex metamorphic and structural history for the western YukonTanana terrane. Garnetbiotite and garnetpyroxene thermometry and jadeite barometry yield prograde temperatures and pressures for the Chatanika eclogite (523°C, 1415 kbar (1 kbar = 100 MPa)). Cooling from peak eclogitization is estimated from 40Ar/39Ar single grain geochronology at ~210180 Ma. Secondary white mica ages of 140115 Ma along the fault contact between eclogite and underlying lower amphibolite-facies rocks constrain the age of the event that placed the Chatanika eclogite over the Fairbanks schist. Based on observations from field mapping and diamond drill samples, we interpret this structural contact as a thrust fault. Garnetbiotite mineral pairs are reset by as much as 200°C within this fault zone. Biotite and white mica ages of ~100110 Ma, combined with Jurassic amphibole ages in Fairbanks schist samples, indicate the Fairbanks schist and Chatanika eclogite cooled through biotite and white mica argon closure temperatures in the early Cretaceous. Intrusion of mid-Cretaceous, calc-alkalic, gold-related granitic plutons in the Fairbanks district are evidenced by loss of radiogenic argon in many of the 40Ar/39Ar age fractions. Eocene basalt is visible in six widely separated localities within the eastern part of the Fairbanks district. However, the pervasiveness of a 50 Ma resetting event in samples as far as 30 km from present day basalt localities indicates the Eocene flows were either deposited throughout the Fairbanks area or are associated with large plutons at depth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".