Étude des propriétés électriques de l'interface La<sub>0,80</sub> Sr<sub>0,20</sub> MnO<sub>3±δ</sub> – Y<sub>0,08</sub> Zr<sub>0,92</sub> O1,96 nanométrique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conductivity of perovskite-type oxide LSM20 was measured in air for different temperatures (375–1273 °K) using the 4 point method. LSM20 was prepared by solid-state reaction starting from mixtures of La2O3, MnCO3, and SrCO3 and sintered at 1673 °K. The results show that conductivity obeys the following law: σ = AT 3/2 exp(–(Ea/kT)), which is representative of an activated jump mechanism between Mn3+ and Mn4+ sites. The LSM20–n (nanometric)YZ8 interface was characterized by impedance spectroscopy. Symmetrical cells with two LSM20 electrodes were used. The electrolyte conductivity values are very close to those obtained with silver electrodes (Ag–nYZ8) showing that the electrolyte response is independent of the nature of the electrode material. The study of the electrode conductivity versus temperature shows an activation energy equal to 1.67 eV slightly lower than that observed by other authors. The nanometric grain size of the electrolyte could be at the origin of this difference. The variation of the electrode conductivity versus oxygen partial pressure is described by the following law σ = σ0 Po21/2, suggesting that the limiting step of the electrode reaction is the dissociative adsorption of O2 on the electrode material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".